Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on August 27, 2007

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dym164
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/1235    most recent
dym164v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunnell, D
Right arrow Articles by Eddleston, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunnell, D
Right arrow Articles by Eddleston, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

The impact of pesticide regulations on suicide in Sri Lanka

D Gunnell1,*, R Fernando2,3, M Hewagama2, W D D Priyangika2, F Konradsen3,4 and M Eddleston3,5

1 Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.
2 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, University of Colombo and National Poisons Information Centre, Sri Lanka.
3 South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC)
4 Department of International Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5 Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK

* Corresponding author. Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK. E-mail: D.J.Gunnell{at}Bristol.ac.uk


   Abstract

Background Between 1950 and 1995 suicide rates in Sri Lanka increased 8-fold to a peak of 47 per 100 000 in 1995. By 2005, rates had halved. We investigated whether Sri Lanka's regulatory controls on the import and sale of pesticides that are particularly toxic to humans were responsible for these changes in the incidence of suicide.

Methods Ecological analysis using graphical and descriptive approaches to identify time trends in suicide and risk factors for suicide in Sri Lanka, 1975–2005.

Results Restrictions on the import and sales of WHO Class I toxicity pesticides in 1995 and endosulfan in 1998, coincided with reductions in suicide in both men and women of all ages. 19 769 fewer suicides occurred in 1996–2005 as compared with 1986–95. Secular trends in unemployment, alcohol misuse, divorce, pesticide use and the years associated with Sri Lanka's Civil war did not appear to be associated with these declines.

Conclusion These data indicate that in countries where pesticides are commonly used in acts of self-poisoning, import controls on the most toxic pesticides may have a favourable impact on suicide. In Asia, there are an estimated 300 000 deaths from pesticide self-poisoning annually. National and international policies restricting the sale of pesticides that are most toxic to humans may have a major impact on suicides in the region.

Keywords suicide, pesticides, Sri Lanka, time trends

Accepted 16 July 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Uses of epidemiology, ways of living and dying.
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1159 - 1160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
V. Patel
Commentary: Preventing suicide: need for a life course approach
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1242 - 1243.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
M. Crandall
Suicide: scientific overview and relevance for trauma care providers
Trauma, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 213 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.