IJE Advance Access first published online on May 17, 2007
This version published online on May 24, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dym095
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality in different educational groups
1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
* Corresponding author. E-mail: martijn.huisman{at}med.umcg.nl
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background The purpose of this study was to assess potential differences in the predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality between educational groups, and to find explanations for any of these educational differences.
Methods We used data from the longitudinal GLOBE study, with a 13-year mortality follow-up. Analyses were performed for people aged between 25–74 years at baseline (n = 16 722). The associations of self-assessed health with mortality were estimated with Cox regression analyses, and the resulting hazard ratios were used as indicators of the ‘predictive ability’ of self-assessed health for mortality. Differences between educational levels were estimated by including an interaction term of education with self-assessed health in regression models with mortality as the outcome. The analyses were subsequently adjusted for: life threatening chronic conditions, non-life threatening conditions, stressors and health behaviour, to test the contribution of these factors to the predictive ability of self-assessed health.
Results Results indicated that the predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality was greater in men with tertiary education as compared with the lowest educated men. No differences were observed in women. None of the four health aspects accounted for the educational difference in men.
Conclusions Because differences in the predictive ability for mortality were limited to the extreme educational groups in men, educational differences in self-assessed health that are reported in numerous studies should not be expected to seriously overestimate educational differences in ‘objective’ health status.
Keywords Self-assessed health, mortality, socioeconomic position, education, predictive ability
The originally published version of this paper was incorrect. The correspondence ‘Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Nertherlands’, was left out.
Martijn Huisman is guarantor of the study.
Accepted 4 April 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Ebrahim Uses of epidemiology, ways of living and dying. Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1159 - 1160. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Quesnel Vallee Self-rated health: caught in the crossfire of the quest for 'true' health? Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1161 - 1164. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Dowd and A. Zajacova Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US? Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1214 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|