Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on May 17, 2007

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dym095
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/1207    most recent
dym095v2
dym095v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mackenbach, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mackenbach, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

The predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality in different educational groups

Martijn Huisman*, Frank van Lenthe and Johan Mackenbach

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

* Corresponding author. E-mail: martijn.huisman{at}med.umcg.nl


   Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to assess potential differences in the predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality between educational groups, and to find explanations for any of these educational differences.

Methods We used data from the longitudinal GLOBE study, with a 13-year mortality follow-up. Analyses were performed for people aged between 25–74 years at baseline (n = 16 722). The associations of self-assessed health with mortality were estimated with Cox regression analyses, and the resulting hazard ratios were used as indicators of the ‘predictive ability’ of self-assessed health for mortality. Differences between educational levels were estimated by including an interaction term of education with self-assessed health in regression models with mortality as the outcome. The analyses were subsequently adjusted for: life threatening chronic conditions, non-life threatening conditions, stressors and health behaviour, to test the contribution of these factors to the predictive ability of self-assessed health.

Results Results indicated that the predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality was greater in men with tertiary education as compared with the lowest educated men. No differences were observed in women. None of the four health aspects accounted for the educational difference in men.

Conclusions Because differences in the predictive ability for mortality were limited to the extreme educational groups in men, educational differences in self-assessed health that are reported in numerous studies should not be expected to seriously overestimate educational differences in ‘objective’ health status.

Keywords Self-assessed health, mortality, socioeconomic position, education, predictive ability


Martijn Huisman is guarantor of the study.

Accepted 4 April 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ebrahim
Uses of epidemiology, ways of living and dying.
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1159 - 1160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Quesnel Vallee
Self-rated health: caught in the crossfire of the quest for 'true' health?
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1161 - 1164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. B. Dowd and A. Zajacova
Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US?
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1214 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.