Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on April 3, 2007

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dym011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/3/580    most recent
dym011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vos, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Excess Indigenous mortality: are Indigenous Australians more severely disadvantaged than other Indigenous populations?

Kenneth Hill1,*, Bridget Barker2 and Theo Vos2

1 Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
2 School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

* Corresponding author. Kenneth Hill, Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA. E-mail: Kenneth_hill{at}harvard.edu.


   Abstract

Background International targets for reducing health inequalities, such as the Millennium Development Goals, are stated in terms of national targets. However, dramatic health differentials exist within countries, even developed ones. Studies indicate that the Indigenous population of Australia suffers a life expectancy disadvantage greater than differentials found in Indigenous populations of other developed countries. We re-examine recent national mortality levels and trends of Indigenous Australians.

Methods Analyses of Indigenous mortality are plagued by ‘numerator–denominator bias’, whereby reporting of Indigenous status differs in deaths (numerators) and population (denominators). We apply demographic evaluation methods developed to address such problems to data from the 1991, 1996 and 2001 censuses of Australia and to the death registration data for the period.

Results The propensity of Australia's population to report Indigenous status increased between each census, particularly between 1991 and 1996, while recording of deaths as Indigenous increased sharply. Adjusted for bias, the Indigenous population had a life expectancy ~13 years below that of the non-Indigenous population, a 2-year greater disadvantage than recently estimated for the Maori in New Zealand. Indigenous mortality fell during the 1990s, but slightly more slowly than that of non-Indigenous Australians, leaving differentials slightly increased.

Conclusions Around the world Indigenous populations are estimated to suffer a mortality disadvantage compared with non-Indigenous populations. However, establishing the magnitude of and trend in the disadvantage is difficult because of bias. Using appropriate methods to adjust for bias, the Indigenous population of Australia is estimated to suffer a life expectancy shortfall of about 13 years, greater than similar gaps in other developed countries.

Keywords Mortality, Indigenous, Australia, numerator–denominator bias

Accepted 24 January 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.