Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on January 25, 2007

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyl271
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/2/412    most recent
dyl271v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catov, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catov, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Risk of early or severe preeclampsia related to pre-existing conditions

Janet M Catov1,*, Roberta B Ness1, Kevin E Kip1 and Jorn Olsen2

1 Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
2 Danish Epidemiology Science Center and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

* Corresponding author. Department of Epidemiology, University of pittsbugh, 130 Desoto street, Pittsbugh, PA 15261, USA. E-mail: jmcst43{at}pitt.edu


   Abstract

Background Preeclampsia (PE), especially severe or early PE, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among mothers and infants. We estimated the population attributable fractions of severe or early PE associated with pre-existing conditions among nulliparous and multiparous women.

Methods Among 70 924 women in the Danish National Birth Cohort, we used hospital discharge data to identify 2117 cases of PE, of which 449 were early (<37 weeks), 426 were severe (clinically diagnosed) and 228 were both early and severe. Prospective interview data were supplemented with hospital registry data to identify women with pre-existing conditions. Generalized estimating equations were utilized to estimate adjusted relative risks, and population attributable fractions were calculated with 95% CI.

Results Pre-existing hypertension, diabetes, obesity or multiple gestation were associated with 22.3% (19.8–24.9) of all PE cases among nulliparous women. These conditions, or a prior preeclamptic pregnancy, were associated with 52.2% (46.4–57.9) of PE among multiparous women. Early PE was preceded by these pre-existing conditions among 34% (28.3–40.0) of affected nulliparous women and among 50% (37.5–63.4) of multiparous women. The fraction of severe PE associated with these conditions was 23% among nulliparas and 59% among multiparas. Being obese or overweight was associated with 15–17% of the population risk of early PE among nulliparous and multiparous women.

Conclusions Pre-existing maternal and obstetric conditions are associated with a high proportion of severe or early cases of PE. Obesity and overweight contributed independently to the risk of pre-term PE, a finding with potentially profound public health implications.

Keywords Preeclampsia, attributable fraction, chronic hypertension, obesity

Accepted 7 November 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. Catov, E. A. Nohr, J. Olsen, and R. B. Ness
Chronic Hypertension Related to Risk for Preterm and Term Small for Gestational Age Births
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2008; 112(2): 290 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
L. M Irgens
Commentary: On the clinical prediction of pre-eclampsia and its enigmatic aetiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 420 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.