Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on December 14, 2006

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyl251
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/1/166    most recent
dyl251v2
dyl251v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Myer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Prospective study of hormonal contraception and women's risk of HIV infection in South Africa

Landon Myer1,*, Lynette Denny2, Thomas C Wright3 and Louise Kuhn1,4

1 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
3 Department of Pathology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA.
4 Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York;USA.

* CorrespondIing author. Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa. E-mail: lmyer{at}cormack.uct.ac.za


   Abstract

Background Many women using hormonal contraceptives are also at risk of sexually transmitted HIV infection, but data are mixed on whether hormonal contraception increases women's risk of HIV. We investigated associations between HIV incidence and use of combined oral contraceptives (COC), norethindrone enanthate (NET-EN) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in a cohort of South African women.

Methods Participants were 4200 HIV-negative women aged 35–49 years enrolled into a cervical cancer screening trial. At enrollment, women were tested for sexually transmitted infections and reported on their sexual behaviour and contraceptive use. During the 24 months of follow-up, women reported on their sexual behaviours and contraceptive use and underwent repeat HIV testing.

Results During the 5010 person-years of follow-up, 111 incident HIV infections were observed (HIV incidence, 2.2 infections/100 person-years). At enrollment, 21% of women reported using hormonal contraception, primarily DMPA (14% of all women) or NET-EN (5%). After adjusting for sexual risk behaviours and sexually transmitted infections, the incidence of HIV was similar among women using COC, NET-EN or DMPA compared with women not using any hormonal method [incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals, 0.65, 0.16–2.66; 0.79, 0.31–2.02 and 0.96, 0.58–1.59, respectively]. There was also no association between increased duration of DMPA use and HIV incidence (P-value for trend, 0.51).

Conclusions These findings contribute to the evidence from general population cohorts of women that hormonal contraceptive use is not associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition. Nonetheless, family planning services are an important venue for HIV prevention activities.

Keywords Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), contraception, risk factors, HIV prevention, women's health, South Africa

Accepted 21 October 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. S Morrison
Commentary: Hormonal contraception and HIV acquisition--current evidence and ongoing research needs
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 175 - 177.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.