IJE Advance Access published online on September 19, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyl185
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Chair of Environmental Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG, London, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Carcinogenesis, at least for some types of cancer, can be interpreted as the consequence of selection of mutated cells similar to what, in the theory of evolution, occurs at the population level. Instead of considering a population of organisms, we can refer to a population of cells belonging to multicellular organisms. Many carcinogens are mutagens, and the observed geographic distribution of cancer is, at least in part, attributable to environmental mutagens. However, the rapid change in risk for some cancers after migration suggests that carcinogenesis involves--in addition to mutations--some late event that most probably consists of the selection of cells already carrying mutations. We review a few examples of such selective pressures: finasteride in prostate cancer, vitamin supplementation in smokers, acquired resistance to chemotherapy, peripheral resistance to insulin, and sunlight and mutations in melanoma. A disease model for such a hypothesis is represented by Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH). Mutations can be present at birth, as in the case of PNH, and can have a frequency much higher than the occurrence of the corresponding disease (PNH or lymphocytic leukaemia in children). However, PNH does not require a mutator phenotype, only a mutant phenotype followed by selection. A characteristic feature of cancer, instead, is likely to be the development of the mutator phenotype. We propose a ‘Darwinian’ model of carcinogenesis. If the model is correct, it suggests that prevention is more complex than avoiding exposure to mutagens. Mutations and genetic instability can be already present at birth. Mutations can be selected in the course of life if they increase survival advantage of the cell under certain environmental circumstances. In addition, gene-environment interactions cannot be interpreted according to a simplified linear model (based on the ‘analysis of variance’ concept); experimental work suggests that a more comprehensive non-linear interpretation based on the idea of ‘norm of reaction’ is needed.
Accepted July 23, 2006
Point-Counterpoint
The population dynamics of cancer: a Darwinian perspective
Paolo Vineis 1 * and Marianne Berwick 2
2 University of New Mexico, Department of Internal Medicine, New Mexico Cancer Research Facility, MSC08 4630, Room 103A, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Paolo Vineis, E-mail: p.vineis{at}imperial.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:
- Commentary: Evolution of action in cells and organisms
- Kenneth M. Weiss
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006 10.1093/ije/dyl186.[Abstract] - Commentary: Cancer--evolution within
- Jarle Breivik
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006 10.1093/ije/dyl187.[Abstract] - Commentary: Induction and selection of variations during cancer development
- Eva Jablonka
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006 10.1093/ije/dyl188.[Abstract] - Commentary: Carcinogenesis as Darwinian evolution? Do the math!
- Robert A. Gatenby
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006 10.1093/ije/dyl192.[Abstract] - It's not easy being interdisciplinary
- John Lynch
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006 10.1093/ije/dyl200.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Saletta, G. Matullo, M. Manuguerra, S. Arena, A. Bardelli, and P. Vineis Exposure to the Tobacco Smoke Constituent 4-Aminobiphenyl Induces Chromosomal Instability in Human Cancer Cells Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7088 - 7094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Nagy, E. M. Victor, and J. H. Cropper Why don't all whales have cancer? A novel hypothesis resolving Peto's paradox Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 47(2): 317 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A. Klein Random mutations, selected mutations: A PIN opens the door to new genetic landscapes PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18033 - 18034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. EBRAHIM Entelechy, citation indexes, and the association of ideas Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1117 - 1118. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lynch It's not easy being interdisciplinary Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1119 - 1122. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Jablonka Commentary: Induction and selection of variations during cancer development Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1163 - 1165. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M Weiss Commentary: Evolution of action in cells and organisms Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1159 - 1160. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A Gatenby Commentary: Carcinogenesis as Darwinian evolution? Do the math! Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1165 - 1167. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Breivik Commentary: Cancer--evolution within Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 35(5): 1161 - 1162. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|