IJE Advance Access published online on January 19, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh413
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road MSD63, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Abbey Court, Lower Abbey Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background Studies in several countries have estimated the prevalence of diarrhoea in the community. However, the use of different study designs and varying case definitions has made international comparisons difficult. Methods Similar cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted in Australia, Canada, Ireland (including Northern Ireland), and the United States over 12 month periods between 2000 and 2002. Each survey asked about diarrhoea in the four weeks before the interview. For this comparative analysis, uniform definitions were used. Results Questionnaires were completed for 6087 respondents in Australia, 3496 in Canada, 9903 in Ireland, and 14 647 in the United States. In the four weeks prior to interview, at least one episode of diarrhoea was reported by 7.6% of respondents in Canada, 7.6% in the United States, 6.4% in Australia, and 3.4% in Ireland. The prevalence of diarrhoea was consistently higher in females. In all countries, the prevalence of diarrhoea was highest in children <5 years and lowest in persons Conclusions Diarrhoea is a common illness among persons in the community in Australia, Canada, Ireland, and the United States. With similar methodologies and a standard case definition, age and sex patterns and health care seeking behaviour were remarkably consistent between countries.
Accepted November 18, 2004
Original paper
Prevalence of diarrhoea in the Community in Australia, Canada, Ireland, and the United States
2 Foodborne, Waterborne and Zoonotic Infections Division, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
3 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
4 Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road MSD63, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
5 Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology, University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
6 Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN, USA
7 OzFoodNet, Food Safety & Surveillance Section, Department of Health and Aging, Canberra, Australia
8 Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Abbey Court, Lower Abbey Street, Dublin 1, Ireland; Department of Public Health, Eastern Regional Health Authority, Dublin, Ireland
Elaine Scallan, E-mail: escallan{at}cdc.gov
Abstract 
65 years of age. When diarrhoea and vomiting was considered, the prevalence was almost identical in the four studies (range: 2.0-2.6%). Despite different health care structures, a similar proportion of respondents sought medical care (approximately one in five). Antibiotic usage for the treatment of diarrhoea was reported by 8.3% of respondents in the United States, 5.6% in Ireland, 3.8% in Canada, and 3.6% in Australia.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. St-Pierre, P. Levallois, S. Gingras, P. Payment, and M. Gignac Risk of diarrhea with adult residents of municipalities with significant livestock production activities J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2009; 31(2): 278 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|