IJE Advance Access published online on September 9, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh325
© 2004 by International Epidemiological Association
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: L.Li{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk.
Background Genetics and early environment are known to influence height, but evidence is sparse on changes in these influences over time. Methods The 1958 British birth cohort study includes all children born between March 3, 1958 and March 9, 1958, who were followed to age 41 yr, and one-third of their offspring in 1991. Childhood height in each generation (measured at 7 yr for cohort members and 4-18 yr for offspring) was converted to a standard deviation score based on the 1990 British growth reference. We used multilevel models to analyse influences on height in order to allow for the hierarchical within-family data structure. Results Childhood height increased by 1 cm between 1958 cohort members and their offspring. Several influences on childhood height in the older generation (maternal smoking, breastfeeding, maternal age, social class, maternal education, and parental divorce) did not affect childhood height in the younger generation. Parental height was most strongly associated with childhood height and effects did not diminish between generations [adjusted increase Conclusions Within Great Britain, the adverse effects of environmental factors on childhood height have lessened between recent generations.
Original paper
Influences on childhood height: comparing two generations in the 1958 British birth cohort
Abstract 
2 cm for 1 maternal or paternal height standard deviation score (SDS)]. Third- or later-borns and those with three or more siblings had deficits of 1-2 cm (adjusted estimates) in both generations. Other factors, particularly indicators of socioeconomic position, showed weaker effects in the younger generation. For example, the growth deficit of 1.1 cm (adjusted estimate) among cohort members from households with >1.5 persons/room had disappeared in the offspring.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. J. Hatton and R. M. Martin The effects on stature of poverty, family size, and birth order: British children in the 1930s Oxf. Econ. Pap., October 13, 2009; (2009) gpp034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Li, C. Law, R. Lo Conte, and C. Power Intergenerational influences on childhood body mass index: the effect of parental body mass index trajectories Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 551 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Z Ehounoux, M-V Zunzunegui, L Seguin, B Nikiema, and L Gauvin Duration of lack of money for basic needs and growth delay in the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2009; 63(1): 45 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Seguin, B. Nikiema, L. Gauvin, M.-V. Zunzunegui, and Q. Xu Duration of Poverty and Child Health in the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development: Longitudinal Analysis of a Birth Cohort Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): e1063 - e1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. P. Gigante, B. L. Horta, R. C. Lima, F. C. Barros, and C. G. Victora Early Life Factors Are Determinants of Female Height at Age 19 Years in a Population-Based Birth Cohort (Pelotas, Brazil) J. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 136(2): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S Pearce, I. J Deary, A. H Young, and L. Parker Growth in early life and childhood IQ at age 11 years: the Newcastle Thousand Families Study Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 673 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|