Skip Navigation



IJE Advance Access published online on September 16, 2004

International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh260
© 2004 by International Epidemiological Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/5/995    most recent
dyh260v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accepted May 18, 2004

Original paper

The role of genetic and environmental factors in the association between birthweight and blood pressure: evidence from meta-analysis of twin studies

G. McNeill 1*, C. Tuya 1, and W. C. S. Smith 1

1 College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.mcneill{at}abdn.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Background An inverse association between birthweight and later blood pressure has been found in many studies in singletons. Twin studies have been used to examine whether genetic factors or family environment could account for this association.

Methods A systematic review identified 10 studies covering 3901 twin pairs. Meta-analysis of regression coefficients for the association between birthweight and systolic blood pressure was carried out for unpaired versus paired associations and for paired associations in dizygotic versus monozygotic pairs.

Results After adjustment for current weight or body mass index (BMI), the difference in systolic blood pressure per kg birthweight was -2.0 (95% CI: -3.2, -0.8) mmHg in the unpaired analysis and -0.4 (95% CI: -1.5, 0.7) mmHg in the paired analysis in the same subjects. In the paired analysis by zygosity, in all twins the coefficients were -0.7 (95% CI: -2.3, 0.8) mmHg in dizygotic pairs and -0.8 (95% CI: -2.1, 0.4) mmHg in monozygotic pairs, but in studies which included zygosity tests the coefficients were -1.0 (95% CI: -3.3, 1.6) mmHg in dizygotic pairs and -0.4 (95% CI: -1.9, 1.3) mmHg in monozygotic pairs.

Conclusions The attenuation of the regression coefficient in the paired analysis provides support for the possibility that factors shared by twins contribute to the association between birthweight and blood pressure in singletons. Comparison of paired analysis in monozygotic and dizygotic pairs could not provide conclusive evidence for a role for genetic as opposed to shared environmental factors.

Keywords: Twins; blood pressure; birthweight; meta-analysis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Hadtstein and F. Schaefer
What adult nephrologists should know about childhood blood pressure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2119 - 2123.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Bergvall, A. Iliadou, S. Johansson, U. de Faire, M. S. Kramer, Y. Pawitan, N. L. Pedersen, P. Lichtenstein, and S. Cnattingius
Genetic and Shared Environmental Factors Do Not Confound the Association Between Birth Weight and Hypertension: A Study Among Swedish Twins
Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2931 - 2938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Lawlor, A. Hubinette, P. Tynelius, D. A. Leon, G. D. Smith, and F. Rasmussen
Associations of Gestational Age and Intrauterine Growth With Systolic Blood Pressure in a Family-Based Study of 386 485 Men in 331 089 Families
Circulation, February 6, 2007; 115(5): 562 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. B Carlin, L. C Gurrin, J. A. Sterne, R. Morley, and T. Dwyer
Regression models for twin studies: a critical review
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1089 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
Epidemiological Freudianism
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Davey Smith
Genetic epidemiology: an 'enlightened narrative'?
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 923 - 924.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
L. J Palmer
The New Epidemiology: putting the pieces together in complex disease aetiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 925 - 928.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.