IJE Advance Access published online on July 28, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/ije/dyh099
© 2004 by International Epidemiological Association
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Evidence and Information for Policy (GPE/EBD), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.lopez{at}sph.uq.edu.au.
Background In many countries, little is known about adult mortality rates. New innovations are necessary to develop reasonable estimates from available information. One readily available resource is household survey data. While birth histories collected in surveys have produced reasonable estimates of child mortality, the use of sibling survival data collected in similar household surveys has not been comprehensively analysed, largely because of concerns of underreporting. Methods This paper uses sibling survival schedules from 29 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) to generate estimates of under-5 mortality and of the summary measure of adult mortality 45q15--the probability of dying between ages 15 and 59. These are then compared with UN child and adult mortality estimates. Results Sibling history data collected in these household surveys seems to contain adequate information to estimate adult mortality rates, though there are problems with underreporting. The correlation coefficient between UN estimates and DHS estimates is 0.74 for adult mortality, indicating a strong relationship between the two but suggesting there may be underreporting of adult deaths in the survey data. Conclusions Further investigation is necessary to determine the usefulness of household survey data for the estimation of adult mortality. New survey instruments like the World Health Survey have incorporated questions to help correct for underreporting in sibling histories. Further analyses need to be carried out in countries where vital registration data are also available, to determine how well household survey data do in estimating adult mortality and whether improvements in the survey instrument adequately correct for underreporting of deaths.
Original paper
Adult mortality: time for a reappraisal
2 School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:
- Commentary: On reappraisal of adult mortality
- P. N. Mari Bhat
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2004 10.1093/ije/dyh235.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Obermeyer, C. J L Murray, and E. Gakidou Fifty years of violent war deaths from Vietnam to Bosnia: analysis of data from the world health survey programme BMJ, June 28, 2008; 336(7659): 1482 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Iraq Family Health Survey Study Group Violence-Related Mortality in Iraq from 2002 to 2006 N. Engl. J. Med., January 31, 2008; 358(5): 484 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yang, C. Rao, J. Ma, L. Wang, X. Wan, G. Dubrovsky, and A. D Lopez Validation of verbal autopsy procedures for adult deaths in China Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 741 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.V. Subramanian, S. Nandy, M. Irving, D. Gordon, H. Lambert, and G. Davey Smith The Mortality Divide in India: The Differential Contributions of Gender, Caste, and Standard of Living Across the Life Course Am J Public Health, May 1, 2006; 96(5): 818 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Taylor, D. Bampton, and A. D Lopez Contemporary patterns of Pacific Island mortality Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 207 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J L Murray, A. D Lopez, and S. Wibulpolprasert Monitoring global health: time for new solutions BMJ, November 6, 2004; 329(7474): 1096 - 1100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



