Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MELTON, L J.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MELTON, L J., III
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, R. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1980 Oxford University Press

research-article

Urban–Rural Differential in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Omisted County, Minnesota, 1935–1974

L JOSEPH MELTON, III*, DANA D BRIAN*,{dagger} and ROBERT L WILLIAMS*,{dagger},{ddagger}

* Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation Rochester, Minnesota, 55901, USA
{dagger} Present address: East Baltimore Medical Plan 1031 Aisquith Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
{ddagger}Present address: Department of Internal Medicine and Community Medicine, Charles R Drew Postgraduate Medical School Los Angeles, California 90056, USA

Melton III L J [Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA] Brian D D and Williams R L. Urban-rural differential in breast cancer incidence and mortality in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935–1974. International Journal of Epidemiology 1980, 9: 155–158.

Between 1935 and 1974, 580 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed among the residents of Rochester, and 187 cases were found among the women living in the remainder of Olmsted County, Minnesota. The age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer was 79.1 per 100 000 person-years among Rochester women and 56.3 per 100 000 person-years among the rural women, for an urban-rural ratio of 1.40: 1. The rural incidence increased more rapidly than did the urban incidence during the period of the study, especially among women 50 years old or older; and the urban-rural ratio seemed to decline with time. No convincing explanation for these changes was found, but migration and increasing urbanisation of rural areas may be important factors. The greater urban incidence and the net migration of rural patients with breast cancer into the urban area explain the higher urban mortality rates for breast cancer.

Revised 3 December 1979


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.