| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1980 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Strategy for Rubella Vaccination
1 Health Services Research Centre, Department of Social Medicine, University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TJ
Knox E G [Health Services Research Centre, Department of Social Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TJ]. Strategy for Rubella vaccination. International Journal of Epidemiology 1980, 9: 1323.
Two separate models are developed for predicting the effectiveness of alternative Rubella vaccination policies. A simple mathematical steady-state model is used to predict long-term consequences and a more complex dynamic computer-simulation model is used in order to predict shorter-term results. The dynamic model takes account of population heterogeneities of the transmission rate, as well as secular changes, together with varying levels of efficacy/uptake, different possibilities of vaccine-immunity decay, and interactions with wild-virus. It is concluded that under optimal conditions of uptake and efficacy the vaccination of pre-school boys and girls will give better results than the vaccination of 14 year old girls alone, but that where conditions are less than optimal the second policy is preferable. For the first policy, low uptake or low efficacy or moderate levels of decaying vaccine-immunity can result in severe rebounds in the incidence of CRS and the medium-term results can be worse than if no vaccination had been provided. If firm reassurance can be obtained regarding the relative permanence of vaccine-immunity, then combined vaccination programmes will give satisfactory safeguards against the risks of low uptake.
Received 27 August 1979
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Robinson, B. E. Lee, J. K. Preiksaitis, S. Plitt, and G. A. Tipples Prevention of Congenital Rubella Syndrome--What Makes Sense in 2006? Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 81 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Peltola, I. Davidkin, M. Paunio, M. Valle, P. Leinikki, and O. P. Heinonen Mumps and Rubella Eliminated From Finland JAMA, November 22, 2000; 284(20): 2643 - 2647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Panagiotopoulos, I. Antoniadou, E. Valassi-Adam, and A. Berger Increase in congenital rubella occurrence after immunisation in Greece: retrospective survey and systematic review • How does herd immunity work? BMJ, December 4, 1999; 319(7223): 1462 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A.D. Cliff and P. Haggett Spatial aspects of epidemic control Progress in Human Geography, September 1, 1989; 13(3): 315 - 347. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Anderson and R. May Directly transmitted infections diseases: control by vaccination Science, February 26, 1982; 215(4536): 1053 - 1060. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




