Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLES, J.M.
Right arrow Articles by WICKINGS, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COLES, J.M.
Right arrow Articles by WICKINGS, H. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1976 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Comparison of Three Health Status Indicators

J.M. COLES, A. J. DAVISON, D. M. NEAL and H. I. WICKINGS

Administrative Headquarters, Brent Health District, Central Middlesex Hospital Acton Lane, London NW10 7NS, England.

Reprint requests should be addressed to Mr. H. I. Wickings

Coles, J.M. (Administrative Headquarters, Brent Health District, Central Middlesex Hospital, Acton Lane, London NW10 7NS, England), Davison, A. J., Neal, D. M.and Wickings, H. I. A comparison of three health status indicators International Journal of Epidemiology 1976, 5: 237–246.

Interest in health status indicators has produced measures of widely varying applicability. We were interested in the use of such indices to establish mean recovery curves for groups of similar patients undergoing acute hospital treatment. A longitudinal study relating resource usage to these recovery curves had been intended but there were difficulties in finding suitable indicators. Firstly, two published indicators relying on patient interviews were tested for consistency. Poor correlations were found among those scorers unfamiliar with the patients and it seems unlikely that these indicators could be used in a routine system. Different parts of the indices presented difficulties to the different professions involved in scoring, and a multidisciplinary approach may be needed in assessing full health. The indicators tested included no assessment of prognosis. Those parts of the indices which had produced significant correlations were retained in subsequent work and were supplemented by further measures designed to overcome the earlier difficulties. A new trial of this indicator was undertaken where staff, familiar with the patients, scored data recorded by the Problem Oriented Medical Record system. This produced improved correlations but some problems remain.

Received 27 April 1976


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.