Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (79)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROGOT, E.
Right arrow Articles by REID, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROGOT, E.
Right arrow Articles by REID, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1975 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Validity of Data from Next-of-kin in Studies of Mortality among Migrants*

EUGENE ROGOT1, and D. D. REID2

1 Epidemiology Branch, National Heart and Lung Institute Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
2 Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street London, WC1, England

Reprint requests should be addressed to Mr. E. Rogot

The design of the British-Norwegian Migrant Study afforded a unique opportunity for comparing in a large sample certain items of information on the same individual, as reported by himself some time before death, with the responses on the same points given after his death in a questionnaire addressed to his next-of-kin. This paper describes a comparison of the degree of agreement between these two methods of obtaining data and draws attention to possible sources and directions of bias involved in the use of information supplied after death by the next-of-kin. Validity, as measured by agreement with the subject's own replies, depends in part on the topic and nature of the information required and on the population included in the survey. A built-in check, such as that incorporated in the British-Norwegian Study, confers the advantage that such biases can be identified and the numerical effect of adjusting for them assessed with some confidence.

Received 29 October 1974


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.