IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2009
International Journal of Epidemiology 2009 38(2):607; doi:10.1093/ije/dyp146
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2009; all rights reserved.
Letters to the Editor |
Author's Response
The triumph of the null hypothesis: epidemiology in an age of change
Civilian Emergency Medicine Faculty, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX, USA.
E-mail: jddmdjd@web-access.net
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Maziak1 outlines the crisis in epidemiology that has been brewing for many years and was documented very forcefully in 1995 by Taubes.2 Taubes then focused mostly on the scandal of small effects research, which is falsely asserted as proof of causation, quoting Marcia Angell of The New England Journal of Medicine, Dimitrious Trichopoulos,