Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on September 20, 2008
International Journal of Epidemiology 2009 38(2):480-489; doi:10.1093/ije/dyn194
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/2/480    most recent
dyn194v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ananth, C. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ananth, C. V
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

A comparison of foetal and infant mortality in the United States and Canada

Cande V Ananth1,*, Shiliang Liu2, KS Joseph3, Michael S Kramer4 and for the Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System

1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Jersey, USA.
2 Maternal and Infant Health Section, Health Surveillance and Epidemiology Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
3 Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada.
4 Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

* Corresponding author: Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1977, USA. E-mail: cande.ananth{at}umdnj.edu


   Abstract

Background Infant mortality rates are higher in the United States than in Canada. We explored this difference by comparing gestational age distributions and gestational age-specific mortality rates in the two countries.

Methods Stillbirth and infant mortality rates were compared for singleton births at ≥22 weeks and newborns weighing ≥500 g in the United States and Canada (1996–2000). Since menstrual-based gestational age appears to misclassify gestational duration and overestimate both preterm and postterm birth rates, and because a clinical estimate of gestation is the only available measure of gestational age in Canada, all comparisons were based on the clinical estimate. Data for California were excluded because they lacked a clinical estimate. Gestational age-specific comparisons were based on the foetuses-at-risk approach.

Results The overall stillbirth rate in the United States (37.9 per 10 000 births) was similar to that in Canada (38.2 per 10 000 births), while the overall infant mortality rate was 23% (95% CI 19–26%) higher (50.8 vs 41.4 per 10 000 births, respectively). The gestational age distribution was left-shifted in the United States relative to Canada; consequently, preterm birth rates were 8.0 and 6.0%, respectively. Stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates in the United States were lower at term gestation only. However, gestational age-specific late neonatal, post-neonatal and infant mortality rates were higher in the United States at virtually every gestation. The overall stillbirth rates (per 10 000 foetuses at risk) among Blacks and Whites in the United States, and in Canada were 59.6, 35.0 and 38.3, respectively, whereas the corresponding infant mortality rates were 85.6, 49.7 and 42.2, respectively.

Conclusions Differences in gestational age distributions and in gestational age-specific stillbirth and infant mortality in the United States and Canada underscore substantial differences in healthcare services, population health status and health policy between the two neighbouring countries.


Keywords Stillbirth, infant mortality, preterm delivery, clinical estimate of gestation, foetuses-at-risk, neonatal intensive care, Kitagawa analysis

Accepted 19 August 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.