Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2008
International Journal of Epidemiology 2008 37(3):602-603; doi:10.1093/ije/dyn062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/3/602    most recent
dyn062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallacher, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallacher, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2008; all rights reserved.

Commentary: Personality and health inequality: inconclusive evidence for an indirect hypothesis

John Gallacher

Department of Psychology, University of Cardiff, Cardiff CF10 3XQ, UK. E-mail: gallacher@Cardiff.ac.uk

Accepted 4 March 2008

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Nabi et al.1 explore the ‘indirect selection’ hypothesis for health inequality, linking personality to relative all cause and cardiovascular mortality using data from the GAZEL study. There have been previous studies linking personality constructs to mortality2 and linking quasi-personality constructs to health inequality3 but none linking psychological status to relative mortality. For men, adjustment for personality factors reduced relative all cause mortality between 34% for education and 28% for income. Surprisingly, father's social class was not related to male mortality. For women the evidence favoured the null hypothesis. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?