Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on September 22, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology 2008 37(2):416-417; doi:10.1093/ije/dym187
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/2/416    most recent
dym187v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Letters to the Editor

Reply

George Davey Smith1,* and Shah Ebrahim2

1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.
2 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

*Corresponding author. E-mail: george.davey-smith@bristol.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We thank Murielle Bochud and colleagues1 for their letter regarding our two review articles on Mendelian randomization.2,3 We agree with them that caution needs to be applied to the interpretation of the findings from Mendelian . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?