IJE Advance Access originally published online on August 27, 2007
International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(5):1111-1118; doi:10.1093/ije/dym157
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2Department of Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
3Centre for Biostatistics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
*Corresponding author. Str. 6.131, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.j.knol{at}umcutrecht.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
Background To determine the presence of interaction in epidemiologic research, typically a product term is added to the regression model. In linear regression, the regression coefficient of the product term reflects interaction as departure from additivity. However, in logistic regression it refers to interaction as departure from multiplicativity. Rothman has argued that interaction estimated as departure from additivity better reflects biologic interaction. So far, literature on estimating interaction on an additive scale using logistic regression only focused on dichotomous determinants. The objective of the present study was to provide the methods to estimate interaction between continuous determinants and to illustrate these methods with a clinical example.
Methods and results From the existing literature we derived the formulas to quantify interaction as departure from additivity between one continuous and one dichotomous determinant and between two continuous determinants using logistic regression. Bootstrapping was used to calculate the corresponding confidence intervals. To illustrate the theory with an empirical example, data from the Utrecht Health Project were used, with age and body mass index as risk factors for elevated diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions The methods and formulas presented in this article are intended to assist epidemiologists to calculate interaction on an additive scale between two variables on a certain outcome. The proposed methods are included in a spreadsheet which is freely available at: http://www.juliuscenter.nl/additive-interaction.xls.
Keywords Interaction, biologic, additive, continuous, effect-modification, relative excess risk
Accepted 3 July 2007
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R W Kobrosly, J R Meliker, and J O Nriagu Automobile industry occupations and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in southeastern Michigan, USA Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2009; 66(10): 650 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Grabe, C. Spitzer, C. Schwahn, A. Marcinek, A. Frahnow, S. Barnow, M. Lucht, H. J. Freyberger, U. John, H. Wallaschofski, et al. Serotonin Transporter Gene (SLC6A4) Promoter Polymorphisms and the Susceptibility to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the General Population Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2009; 166(8): 926 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Richardson and J. S. Kaufman Estimation of the Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction and Associated Confidence Bounds Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2009; 169(6): 756 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Zou On the Estimation of Additive Interaction by Use of the Four-by-two Table and Beyond Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2008; 168(2): 212 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Zafarmand, Y. T. van der Schouw, D. E. Grobbee, P. W. de Leeuw, and M. L. Bots {alpha}-Adducin Gly460Trp Variant Increases the Risk of Stroke in Hypertensive Dutch Women Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1665 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



