Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(4):948-953; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/4/948    most recent
dyl116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bech, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bech, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Article

Stillbirth and slow metabolizers of caffeine: comparison by genotypes

Bodil Hammer Bech1,*, Herman Autrup2, Ellen Aagaard Nohr1, Tine Brink Henriksen3 and Jørn Olsen1,4

1 The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
2 Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
3 Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Paediatrics Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
4 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

* Corresponding author. The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Institute of Public Health, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, Building 1260, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark. E-mail: bhb{at}soci.au.dk

Background Cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) are key enzymes in the metabolism of caffeine. The polymorphism of these genes facilitates the detection of fast and slow metabolizers, and if caffeine is causally related to stillbirth, we expect slow metabolizers to have a higher risk of stillbirth at any given intake of caffeine. Gluthatione S-transferase {alpha}1 (GSTA1) may also be active in the metabolism of caffeine as it conjugates glutathione to aromatic amines. Our study, therefore, included analyses of the association between GSTA1 and stillbirth.

Methods A nested case non-case study among women who participated in the Danish National Birth Cohort: 142 cases of singleton stillbirths and 157 controls of singleton live births.

Results Slow oxidizer status (CYP1A2), slow acetylator status (NAT2), and low activity of GSTA1 were not individually associated with the risk of stillbirth [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.67–1.67, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.60–1.51, and OR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.88–2.28, respectively]. We did, however, observe that subjects with a combination of slow CYP1A2, slow NAT2, and low GSTA1 genes had almost a 2-fold risk of stillbirth compared with subjects with other combinations of genotypes.

Conclusions We found no link between any single genotype and the risk of stillbirth. An association between a combination of genotypes and stillbirth was discovered. Caffeine may be causally related to stillbirth, but larger studies using Mendelian randomization are needed to verify this.


Keywords caffeine, CYP1A2, NAT2, GSTA1, stillbirth

Accepted 5 May 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. SMITH
Mensuration, Mendel, and a 19th century public health justification for US imperialism
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 811 - 813.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.