Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(4):932-934; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/4/932    most recent
dyl107v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, R. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, R. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Commentary

Commentary: Genes as instruments for evaluation of markers and causes

Robert J Glynn

Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham, Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. E-mail: rglynn@rics.bwh.harvard.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this issue of the journal, Casas et al.1 provide important information on a genetic determinant of C-reactive protein (CRP) with little apparent relationship to risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The implications of these relationships for our understanding of a possibly causal role of inflammation in CHD can shed light on the contributions of Mendelian randomization to causal inference in epidemiology. Mendelian randomization gives a focused evaluation of causality, but it relies on strong assumptions and may be of limited usefulness in the evaluation of CRP as a marker of inflammation when the genetic variant has a modest ability to predict the phenotype of interest.


    The mechanics of Mendelian randomization
 
Mendelian randomization capitalizes on the random allocation of a genetic variant that influences an intermediate phenotype such as CRP to evaluate the possibly confounded relationship of that phenotype with an outcome such as CHD. A variety of approaches have been used in actual . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Strength of instruments, markers, and causes
 

    Disclosure
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
'Something funny seems to happen': J.B.S. Haldane and our chaotic, complex but understandable world
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 423 - 426.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sturmer, S. Schneeweiss, K. J. Rothman, J. Avorn, and R. J. Glynn
Sturmer et al. Respond to "Propensity Score Methods in Epidemiology"
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2007; 165(10): 1122 - 1123.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. SMITH
Mensuration, Mendel, and a 19th century public health justification for US imperialism
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 811 - 813.
[Full Text] [PDF]