Skip Navigation

International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(4):1022-1024; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bingham, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Day, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bingham, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Day, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Commentary

Commentary: Fat and breast cancer: time to re-evaluate both methods and results?

Sheila A Bingham* and Nicholas Day

MRC Centre for Nutrition and Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, UK

* Corresponding author. MRC Centre for Nutrition and Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK. E-mail: Sheila.bingham@srl.cam.ac.uk.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

International comparisons, comparisons within countries, time trends within countries, case–control studies, and animal studies are all consistent with a positive relationship between incidence of breast cancer and fat consumption.1 Cohort studies are normally considered free of the bias that potentially affect case–control studies, but, in contrast to expectations that a relationship would be confirmed, reports of pooled cohort data show no relation between total or types of fat intake and breast cancer risk.2 In a summary of the prospective studies relating fat to breast cancer risk, it was concluded that there was moderate evidence to conclude that total fat in adult life ‘does not influence’ the risk of breast cancer independently of BMI,1 while in another summary in which evidence from both case–control and prospective studies was used, the evidence of increased risk was classified as ‘possible’.3

However, concerns about the accuracy of dietary assessment methods used in the epidemiology . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Chlebowski
Lifestyle Change Including Dietary Fat Reduction and Breast Cancer Outcome
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 233S - 235S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. SMITH
Mensuration, Mendel, and a 19th century public health justification for US imperialism
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 811 - 813.
[Full Text] [PDF]