IJE Advance Access originally published online on January 30, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(3):765-775; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi312
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods
Departments of Epidemiology and Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. E-mail: lesdomes{at}ucla.edu
One misconception (of many) about Bayesian analyses is that prior distributions introduce assumptions that are more questionable than assumptions made by frequentist methods; yet the assumptions in priors can be more reasonable than the assumptions implicit in standard frequentist models. Another misconception is that Bayesian methods are computationally difficult and require special software. But perfectly adequate Bayesian analyses can be carried out with common software for frequentist analysis. Under a wide range of priors, the accuracy of these approximations is just as good as the frequentist accuracy of the software—and more than adequate for the inaccurate observational studies found in health and social sciences. An easy way to do Bayesian analyses is via inverse-variance (information) weighted averaging of the prior with the frequentist estimate. A more general method expresses the prior distributions in the form of prior data or ‘data equivalents’, which are then entered in the analysis as a new data stratum. That form reveals the strength of the prior judgements being introduced and may lead to tempering of those judgements. It is argued that a criterion for scientific acceptability of a prior distribution is that it be expressible as prior data, so that the strength of prior assumptions can be gauged by how much data they represent.
Keywords Bayesian methods, biostatistics, odds ratio, relative risk, risk assessment
Accepted 15 December 2005
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Greenland Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods Int. J. Epidemiol., September 9, 2009; (2009) dyp278v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul Bayesian Classification of Clinical Practice Guidelines Arch Intern Med, August 10, 2009; 169(15): 1431 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R Cole, H. Chu, L. Nie, and E. F Schisterman Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection Int. J. Epidemiol., August 10, 2009; (2009) dyp269v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. D'Aloisio, J. C. Schroeder, K. E. North, C. Poole, S. L. West, G. S. Travlos, and D. D. Baird IGF-I and IGFBP-3 Polymorphisms in Relation to Circulating Levels among African American and Caucasian Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 954 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Greenland Weaknesses of Bayesian model averaging for meta-analysis in the study of vitamin E and mortality Clinical Trials, February 1, 2009; 6(1): 42 - 46. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Greenland and L. Kheifets Designs and analyses for exploring the relationship of magnetic fields to childhood leukaemia: A pilot project for the Danish National Birth Cohort Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 83 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. R. Babu Comment on 'From risk factors to explanation in public health' J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2008; 30(4): 515 - 516. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Osterstock, G. T. Fosgate, N. D. Cohen, J. N. Derr, and A. J. Roussel Familial and herd-level associations with paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay status in beef cattle J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1977 - 1983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. DiMaggio, S. Galea, and D. Abramson Analyzing Postdisaster Surveillance Data: The Effect of the Statistical Method Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness, June 1, 2008; 2(2): 119 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Greenland Multiple comparisons and association selection in general epidemiology Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 430 - 434. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Lopes, V. L. Andreozzi, E. Ramos, and M. Sa Carvalho Modelling over week patterns of alcohol consumption Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2008; 43(2): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Greenland Invited Commentary: Variable Selection versus Shrinkage in the Control of Multiple Confounders Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2008; 167(5): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Cole and H. Chu RE: "CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR BIOMARKER-BASED HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INCIDENCE ESTIMATES AND DIFFERENCES USING PREVALENT DATA" Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 166(7): 861 - 862. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M Jurek, G. Maldonado, S. Greenland, and T. R Church Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2007; 61(7): 650 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. N. Goodman Stopping at Nothing? Some Dilemmas of Data Monitoring in Clinical Trials Ann Intern Med, June 19, 2007; 146(12): 882 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Greenland Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis Int. J. Epidemiol., February 28, 2007; (2007) dyl289v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. EBRAHIM The future of modern epidemiology: genetics, methods, and history Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 511 - 512. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R Carpenter Commentary: On Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 775 - 777. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|