Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 31, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(3):740; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/740    most recent
dyl061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Article

Response: Response to the Stampfer commentary

Joseph Kim*, Stephen Evans, Liam Smeeth and Stuart Pocock

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

* Corresponding author. E-mail: joe.kim@lshtm.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We thank Dr Stampfer for his helpful comments.1 We agree with his interpretation that unmeasured confounding is unlikely to be the only explanation for the HRT controversy given the available evidence in literature. However, we disagree with his remarks concerning our definition of the term ‘initiation,’ where he suggests we have used ‘misleading . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?