IJE Advance Access originally published online on May 9, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(3):614-615; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl084
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.
Commentary |
Commentary: Bonding, bridging, and linkingbut still not much going on
1 Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
2 Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
* Corresponding author. PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.E-mail: tony.blakely@otago.ac.nz
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Much has been said about social capital and its association (if any) with health. And a common plea is to return to the theoretical underpinning of social capital, and why and how it might be associated with various outcomes including health. Szretzer and Woolcock have proposed a possible step forward in the conceptualization of social capital, arguing that there may be linking forms of social capital in addition to previously recognized bonding and bridging forms of social capital.1