Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(2):466-467; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/466    most recent
dyl040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whalley, L. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whalley, L. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2006; all rights reserved.

Commentary

Commentary: Childhood education and disparities in adult health—the need for improved theories and better data

Lawrence J Whalley

Department of Mental Health, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Forresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZH, UK.

E-mail: l.j.whalley@abdn.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Contemporary theories of social inequalities in health seek to elucidate the core principles determining disease distributions and individual susceptibilities to specific disorders. An extensive literature supports the roles of specific insults and buffers, each derived from careful observational studies, many of which reliably identify associations at a population level between specific factors and disease incidence. Amongst these factors, many acting and interacting in complex ways at multiple levels, the role of childhood education (gauged by duration or attainment) is consistently shown to be a major and pervasive influence on health inequalities.1 The influence of education, in some studies, acts independently of socioeconomic status and initial intelligence.2,3 Thus, there seems to be some aspect of education that uniquely captures individual differences not detected by other means. The predictive power of ‘education’ is a key fact . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?