Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 15, 2006
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(2):446-447; doi:10.1093/ije/dyl018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/446    most recent
dyl018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garfield, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garfield, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2006

Commentary

Commentary: When should we monitor mortality in humanitarian crises?

Richard Garfield

Columbia University, 617 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. E-mail: garfier@gmail.com

Accepted 24 January 2006

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

This paper on mortality patterns in Guinea-Bissau1 contributes to the current extensive discussions on monitoring mortality rates during humanitarian crises. Mortality is the most sincere expression of vulnerability and, when well monitored, should direct efforts for relief, protection, and humanitarian intervention. Unfortunately, areas with humanitarian crises in the world today seldom enjoy . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?