IJE Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(1):81-82; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi299
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.
Response |
Response: lifestyle not weight should be the primary target
1 School of Law, University of Colorado, CO, USA
2 Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3 Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
4 Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
5 Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, VA, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: Paul.Campos@colorado.edu
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
We are glad to see such a wide range of esteemed scholars engage complex questions surrounding the relationship between body mass and health. We are also pleased to see so many points of agreement between our respondents and ourselves. First, everyone is in agreement with the parameters of global weight change, as defined in detail by Flegal1the average person has gained about one pound per year. Opinions vary sharply over the likely consequences of this creeping epidemic.
Second, as many acknowledge, the debate surrounding weight and health is often contentious and confusing because of economic and cultural factors that affect it at every turn. For instance,
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. B. Wolf Is Breast Really Best? Risk and Total Motherhood in the National Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 595 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
