Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on November 12, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(1):139-140; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/139    most recent
dyi217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blane, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blane, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.

Commentary

Commentary: The place in life course research of validated measures of socioeconomic position

David Blane

Imperial College London, Charing Cross, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK

E-mail: d.blane@imperial.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Among the attractions of social epidemiology (or social medicine—call it what you will) is the opportunity for medicine and social science to collaborate. An inspiration in this respect is the example set in the mid-20th century by Richard Titmuss and Jerry Morris,1 who arguably established this sub-discipline. Collaborations such as that between Titmuss and Morris are required if we wish to explain the social patterning of health and disease in terms of processes that are plausible both socially and biologically. The work is most creative when each half of the collaboration respects and acquires elementary knowledge of the other discipline; something that often is not achieved. A contemporary example of sub-optimal collaboration is the continued use by social epidemiologists of the term ‘socioeconomic status’—a thought prompted by the otherwise excellent . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
F. Popham and R. Mitchell
Self-rated life expectancy and lifetime socio-economic position: cross-sectional analysis of the British household panel survey
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]