IJE Advance Access originally published online on November 12, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2006 35(1):139-140; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi217
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.
Commentary |
Commentary: The place in life course research of validated measures of socioeconomic position
Imperial College London, Charing Cross, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK
E-mail: d.blane@imperial.ac.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Among the attractions of social epidemiology (or social medicinecall it what you will) is the opportunity for medicine and social science to collaborate. An inspiration in this respect is the example set in the mid-20th century by Richard Titmuss and Jerry Morris,1 who arguably established this sub-discipline. Collaborations such as that between Titmuss and Morris are required if we wish to explain the social patterning of health and disease in terms of processes that are plausible both socially and biologically. The work is most creative when each half of the collaboration respects and acquires elementary knowledge of the other discipline; something that often is not achieved. A contemporary example of sub-optimal collaboration is the continued use by social epidemiologists of the term socioeconomic statusa thought prompted by the otherwise excellent
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Popham and R. Mitchell Self-rated life expectancy and lifetime socio-economic position: cross-sectional analysis of the British household panel survey Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
