IJE Advance Access originally published online on November 18, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(6):1376-1377; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi228
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.
Commentary |
Commentary: About that measurement problem
Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
E-mail: james.marshall@roswellpark.org
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The goal of epidemiological inquiry is to estimate the extent to which conditions and exposures affect our risks of the diseases that afflict us; we seek to know how much of the risk of disease might be attributed to a given exposure or condition. Given finite resources and options, we want to identify the most important among malleable risk factors, so that we can focus on those.
This is true of the occupational setting from which Fox et al.1 drew their example: given that we cannot eliminate all hazards to workers, or to those who may be exposed to
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. B. GORI Dimensional errors of metaphorical measurements. Can they be resolved? Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2006; 35(6): 1590 - 1592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
