IJE Advance Access originally published online on June 3, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(4):896-897; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi116
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2005; all rights reserved.
Commentary |
Commentary: Income inequality and reproductive outcomesthat model is best which models the least
Department of Epidemiology, UNC School of Public Health, 2104C McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Pittsboro Road, CB#7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA. E-mail: Jay_Kaufman@unc.edu
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
One thing that most of us have figured out by now is that when it comes to health outcomes, it is not good to be poor. Furthermore, in a racially stratified society, it is generally not good for one's health to be a member of the racial group that isn't advantaged in the social hierarchy. All this has been known for a long time, but what social epidemiologists have managed to do quite successfully of late is to suggest new ways of classifying places that are independently predictive of risk for adverse outcomes, conditional on those previously defined individual-level classifications. One of the most successful of these new constructs is income inequality,