IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(3):630-637; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi043
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
Explaining socioeconomic inequality in mortality among South Koreans: an examination of multiple pathways in a nationally representative longitudinal study
1 Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea
* Corresponding author. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-Dong Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 138–736 Korea. E-mail: youngk{at}amc.seoul.kr
Background South Korea has a different cause-specific structure of mortality compared with North America and northern European countries where studies on pathways to socioeconomic mortality inequalities have been performed. We examined the ability of multiple pathways to explain socioeconomic differentials in all-cause mortality in South Korea.
Methods The 1998 National Health and Nutrition Survey data of South Korea were linked to data on mortality. The socioeconomic position (SEP) indicator was household income. Twelve variables represented biological risk factors (body mass index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, and regular exercise), psychosocial factors (feelings of sadness and depression, perceived level of stress, and marital status), and early life exposures (education and adulthood height).
Results Mortality differentials by income level did not decrease after exclusion of subjects with severe chronic illness or functional limitation. Biological risk factors, health behaviours, and psychosocial factors caused minor reductions in relative risk for income levels. The ability of early life exposures to explain socioeconomic differentials in mortality was greater than that of biological risk factors, health behaviours, and psychosocial factors.
Conclusions The contribution of multiple pathways to socioeconomic differentials in all-cause mortality may vary in place with the different cause-specific structure of mortality. Future studies with specific pathway variables and specific disease outcomes would provide better understanding of causal mechanisms between SEP and health.
Keywords Socioeconomic position, South Korea, mortality
Accepted 19 January 2005
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Skalicka, F. van Lenthe, C. Bambra, S. Krokstad, and J. Mackenbach Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 38(5): 1272 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. N. Arendt and J. Lauridsen Do risk factors explain more of the social gradient in self-reported health when adjusting for baseline health? Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 18(2): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y H Khang, J W Lynch, K Jung-Choi, and H J Cho Explaining age-specific inequalities in mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease among South Korean male public servants: relative and absolute perspectives Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Smith Infection, medical care and inequalities Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 507 - 508. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Singh-Manoux Commentary: Modelling multiple pathways to explain social inequalities in health and mortality Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 638 - 639. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|