IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2005
International Journal of Epidemiology 2005 34(2):479-480; doi:10.1093/ije/dyi036
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association
Letters to the Editor |
Response
St John's College, Cambridge CB2 1TP, UK. E-mail: srss@cam.ac.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
I am grateful to Razzell and Spence for their commentary. However, I find both the data which they deploy in the first half of their letter and their social class analysis in the second half of the letter are somewhat at cross-purposes with the evidence and arguments being deployed both in Szreter and Woolcock1 and in the supporting research and interpretation on which its summary of British mortality history is based.2,3 Consequently, while what they say is interesting, I do not find it especially relevant or persuasive as a critique of the interpretation, which was offered in Szreter and Woolcock.
As Razzell and Spence4 note,
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Razzell and C. Spence Social capital and the history of mortality in Britain Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1163 - 1164. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
