Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology 2004 33(6):1389-1397; doi:10.1093/ije/dyh276
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/6/1389    most recent
dyh276v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenland, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenland, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

IJE vol.33 no.6 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.

Education and Debate

Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals

Sander Greenland

Departments of Epidemiology and Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1772, USA. E-mail: lesdomes{at}ucla.edu

There are numerous techniques for constructing confidence intervals, most of which are unavailable in standard software. Modern computing power allows one to replace these techniques with relatively simple, general simulation methods. These methods extend easily to incorporate sources of uncertainty beyond random error. The simulation concepts are explained in an example of estimating a population attributable fraction, a problem for which analytical formulas can be quite unwieldy. First, simulation of conventional intervals is illustrated and compared to bootstrapping. The simulation is then extended to include sampling of bias parameters from prior distributions. It is argued that the use of almost any neutral or survey-based prior that allows non-zero values for bias parameters will produce an interval estimate less misleading than a conventional confidence interval. Along with simplicity and generality, the ease with which simulation can incorporate these priors is a key advantage over conventional methods.


Keywords Attributable fraction, attributable risk, Bayesian methods, bias, bootstrapping, confidence intervals, confounding, meta-analysis, Monte Carlo methods, relative risk, risk analysis, simulation

Accepted 2 June 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Greenland
Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods
Int. J. Epidemiol., September 9, 2009; (2009) dyp278v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G Maldonado
Adjusting a relative-risk estimate for study imperfections
J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2008; 62(7): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. J. Murphy, B. C. Reeves, C. A. Rogers, S. I.A. Rizvi, L. Culliford, and G. D. Angelini
Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having Cardiac Surgery
Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2544 - 2552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A. M Jurek, G. Maldonado, S. Greenland, and T. R Church
Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion
J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2007; 61(7): 650 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. L. Lash, M. P. Fox, S. S. Thwin, A. M. Geiger, D. S. M. Buist, F. Wei, T. S. Field, M. U. Yood, F. J. Frost, V. P. Quinn, et al.
Using Probabilistic Corrections to Account for Abstractor Agreement in Medical Record Reviews
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2007; 165(12): 1454 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. J. Fenton, Y. Cai, N. S. Weiss, J. G. Elmore, R. E. Pardee, R. J. Reid, and L.-M. Baldwin
Delivery of Cancer Screening: How Important Is the Preventive Health Examination?
Arch Intern Med, March 26, 2007; 167(6): 580 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Greenland
Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 28, 2007; (2007) dyl289v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Hemminki, J. Ji, and A. Forsti
Risks for Familial and Contralateral Breast Cancer Interact Multiplicatively and Cause a High Risk
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 868 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. R. Cole, H. Chu, and R. Brookmeyer
Confidence Intervals for Biomarker-based Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence Estimates and Differences using Prevalent Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2007; 165(1): 94 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. C. Reeves
Limitations of analyses of effectiveness using observational data
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2006; 27(14): 1642 - 1643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
I Gemmell, R F Heller, P McElduff, K Payne, G Butler, R Edwards, M Roland, and P Durrington
Population impact of stricter adherence to recommendations for pharmacological and lifestyle interventions over one year in patients with coronary heart disease
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2005; 59(12): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. P Fox, T. L Lash, and S. Greenland
A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1370 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.