IJE Advance Access originally published online on May 27, 2004
International Journal of Epidemiology 2004 33(4):884-893; doi:10.1093/ije/dyh155
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IJE vol.33 no.4 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.
Article |
Does conflict between home and work explain the effect of multiple roles on mental health? A comparative study of Finland, Japan, and the UK
1 International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. E-mail: tarani{at}public-health.ucl.ac.uk
2 Population Research Unit, Department of Sociology, PO Box 18, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
3 Department of Public Health, PO Box 41, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
4 Department of Welfare Promotion and Epidemiology, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
Background Although there have been a number of studies on the effects of multiple roles on health and how a combination of work and family roles may be either advantageous (role enhancement) or disadvantageous (role strain) for health, there has been relatively little investigation on the psychosocial content of such roles. Work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict could arise from inability to combine multiple roles and result in stress and ill health. The question of whether both types of conflict mediate between the association of multiple roles with health has not been analysed before. This paper sets out to investigate whether: (1) work-to-family conflict or family-to-work conflict contributes towards explaining the association of multiple roles with mental health; (2) the effect of work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict on mental health varies by gender; (3) the effect of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict on mental health vary between countries with different welfare state arrangements and social norms.
Methods Cross-sectional data of economically active male and female public sector employees aged 35–60 in London (UK), Helsinki (Finland), and the West Coast of Japan. Linear regression models (separate for each gender and cohort) of SF-36 mental component scores were analysed with role combinations, family-to-work and work-to-family conflict as explanatory variables.
Results Single fathers in all three cohorts and of single mothers in the Helsinki cohort had poor mental health, and this was partly explained by their higher levels family-to-work conflict. Both types of conflict affect the mental health of men and women independently of each other. Japanese women had the greatest conflict and poorest mental health while Helsinki women had the lowest conflict and best mental health.
Conclusion Both work-to-family and family-to-work conflict affect the mental health of men and women in three different countries. Work and family roles and the balance between the two may be important for the mental health of men and women in industrialized societies. Any analysis of the effect of multiple roles on health needs to take into account the psychosocial content of such roles.
Keywords Role strain, role conflict, SF-36, mental health, comparative, psychosocial, gender
Accepted 26 January 2004
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B Floderus, M Hagman, G Aronsson, S Marklund, and A Wikman Work status, work hours and health in women with and without children Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2009; 66(10): 704 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Ikeda, H Iso, I Kawachi, K Yamagishi, M Inoue, S Tsugane, and for the JPHC Study Group Living arrangement and coronary heart disease: the JPHC study Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Honjo, H. Iso, M. Inoue, S. Tsugane, and for the JPHC Study Group Education, Social Roles, and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Middle-Aged Japanese Women: The JPHC Study Cohort I Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2886 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Cable, A Sacker, and M Bartley The effect of employment on psychological health in mid-adulthood: findings from the 1970 British Cohort Study J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2008; 62(5): e10 - e10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Laaksonen, P Martikainen, O Rahkonen, and E Lahelma Explanations for gender differences in sickness absence: evidence from middle-aged municipal employees from Finland Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2008; 65(5): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J L Wang, A Lesage, N Schmitz, and A Drapeau The relationship between work stress and mental disorders in men and women: findings from a population-based study J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2008; 62(1): 42 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Staland-Nyman, K. Alexanderson, and G. Hensing Associations between strain in domestic work and self-rated health: A study of employed women in Sweden Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Artazcoz, C. Borrell, I. Cortas, V. Escriba-Aguir, and L. Cascant Occupational epidemiology and work related inequalities in health: a gender perspective for two complementary approaches to work and health research J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2007; 61(Suppl_2): ii39 - ii45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Berntsson, U Lundberg, and G Krantz Gender differences in work-home interplay and symptom perception among Swedish white-collar employees. J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2006; 60(12): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|