IJE Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 603-604
IJE vol.33 no.3 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.
Article |
Commentary: Does tubal sterilization reduce the risk of gynaecological cancers?
Population and Clinical Sciences Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4029 Australia. E-mail: davidP@qimr.edu.au
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Tubal sterilization is the most common form of birth control used in the world.1 Between 1994 and 1996, more than 2 million tubal sterilizations were performed in the US,2 with 28% of women aged 1544 years relying on this method of contraception.3 Advances in laparoscopic techniques have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of women undergoing tubal sterilization, with nearly all interval procedures (i.e.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Reid, A. Segal, J. S. Heyworth, N. H. de Klerk, and A. W. Musk Gynecologic and Breast Cancers in Women After Exposure to Blue Asbestos at Wittenoom Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
