Skip Navigation


IJE Advance Access originally published online on March 24, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/3/542    most recent
dyh127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, R. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, D. M
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, R. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 542-548
IJE vol.33 no.3 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.


Infectious Diseases

Trends in antenatal human immunodeficiency virus prevalence in Western Kenya and Eastern Uganda: evidence of differences in health policies?

David M Moore1 and Robert S Hogg1,2

1 Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2 BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Correspondence: Dr David M Moore, Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. E-mail: dmooretango{at}netscape.net

Objective To observe recent trends in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence in antenatal clinic attendees to determine if previously noted falls in HIV prevalence are occurring on both sides of the Kenyan-Ugandan border.

Design An ecologic study was conducted at the district level comparing HIV prevalence rates over time using data available through reports published by the Kenyan and Ugandan Ministries of Health and UNAIDS.

Methods Sentinel sites were compared with respect to population, ethnicity, language group, and the prevalence of circumcision practice. The prevalence of HIV found at each sentinel site was recorded for the years 1990–2000 and analysed visually and by conducting bivariate correlations.

Results Ethnographic analysis revealed a wide mix of ethnic and language groups and circumcision rates on both sides of the border. All sentinel surveillance sites in Uganda showed trends towards decreasing HIV prevalence, with three of five sites showing statistically significant declines (r = –0.87, –0.85, –0.86, P < 0.05). In contrast, all of the surveillance sites in Kenya showed trends toward increasing HIV prevalence, with two of the five sites showing statistically significant increases (r = 0.62, 0.84, P < 0.05).

ConclusionsThe declines in HIV prevalence occurring in Uganda are not being seen in geographically proximal districts of Kenya. No obvious differences in ethnic groupings or their associated prevalence of circumcision appeared to explain these differences. This suggests that decreasing HIV prevalence in Uganda is not due to the natural course of the epidemic but reflects real success in terms of HIV control policies.


Keywords Uganda, Kenya, HIV, AIDS, prevalence, health policy, epidemiology

Accepted 27 January 2004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. M Spiegel
Commentary: Daring to learn from a good example and break the 'Cuba taboo'.
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 825 - 826.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. May
Commentary: Still dying of ignorance? Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention strategies revisited
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 549 - 550.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.