Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ades, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ades, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 2, pp. 426-427
IJE vol.33 no.2 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.


Commentary

Commentary: Evidence synthesis and evidence consistency

AE Ades

MRC Health Research Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK. E-mail: t.ades{at}bristol.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The paper by van Valkengoed1 is a critique of the way in which investigators have chosen parameter values for cost effectiveness analyses (CEA), but it also suggests a way of looking at evidence that is seriously underused in both epidemiology and medical decision making.

The essential problem is set out schematically in Figure 1. The adult female population is at risk of chlamydial infection; a proportion of those infected develop pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and PID may in a proportion of cases lead to ectopic pregnancies and/or infertility. Other causal pathways can lead to these outcomes, although it may be possible to determine approximately what proportion of them can be attributed to chlamydia.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Schematic disease progression model for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, with parameters a (prevalence of infection), b the probability of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?