International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 33, Number 2, pp. 289-296
IJE vol.33 no.2 © International Epidemiological Association 2004; all rights reserved.
Article |
Social class differences in coronary heart disease in middle-aged British men: implications for prevention
1 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, NW3 2PF, UK
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, SW17 0RE, UK
Correspondence: Mr Jonathan Emberson, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF, UK. E-mail: j.emberson{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Background Though social class differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) are well recognized, few studies have assessed the effect of imprecision in social class assessment on the relationship or the overall contribution of social class to attributable CHD risk.
Methods Prospective observational study of the relationship between occupational social class (assessed at baseline and after 20 years), major CHD (coronary death and non-fatal myocardial infarction) and all-cause mortality rates over 20 years among 5628 middle-aged British men with no previous evidence of CHD.
Results The age-adjusted hazard of major CHD for manual men relative to non-manual men was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.64) before correction and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.25, 1.79) after correction for imprecision of social class measurement. The imprecision-corrected estimate was attenuated to 1.28 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.54) after adjustment for the adult coronary risk factors (blood cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, cigarette smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and lung function) and to 1.20 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.45) following further adjustment for height. The population attributable risk fraction of major CHD for social class (manual versus non-manual) was 22% after correction for imprecision in social class, which was reduced to 14% after adjustment for the adult coronary risk factors, and 10% after further adjustment for height. Similar results were obtained for all-cause mortality.
Conclusions Even taking account of measurement imprecision, the contribution of social class to overall CHD risk is modest. Population-wide strategies to reduce major CHD risk factors are likely to have greater potential benefits for CHD prevention than strategies designed specifically to reduce social inequalities in CHD.
Keywords Coronary heart disease, social class, risk factor assessment, attributable risk
Accepted 15 July 2003
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M O'Flaherty, E Ford, S Allender, P Scarborough, and S Capewell Coronary heart disease trends in England and Wales from 1984 to 2004: concealed levelling of mortality rates among young adults Heart, February 1, 2008; 94(2): 178 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S E Ramsay, R W Morris, L T Lennon, S G Wannamethee, and P H Whincup Are social inequalities in mortality in Britain narrowing? Time trends from 1978 to 2005 in a population-based study of older men J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2008; 62(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. S. Reddy, D. Prabhakaran, P. Jeemon, K. R. Thankappan, P. Joshi, V. Chaturvedi, L. Ramakrishnan, and F. Ahmed Educational status and cardiovascular risk profile in Indians PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16263 - 16268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E Ramsay, P. H Whincup, R. W Morris, L. T Lennon, and S. Wannamethee Are childhood socio-economic circumstances related to coronary heart disease risk? Findings from a population-based study of older men Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 560 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lynch, G. Davey Smith, S. Harper, and K. Bainbridge Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2006; 60(5): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Avendano, A E Kunst, M Huisman, F V Lenthe, M Bopp, E Regidor, M Glickman, G Costa, T Spadea, P Deboosere, et al. Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in 10 western European populations during the 1990s Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(4): 461 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Blakely and N. Wilson The contribution of smoking to inequalities in mortality by education varies over time and by sex: two national cohort studies, 1981-84 and 1996-99 Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1054 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H Leyland Socioeconomic gradients in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in Scotland: the roles of composition and context J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2005; 59(9): 799 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Smith Infection, medical care and inequalities Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 507 - 508. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Emberson, P. Whincup, R. Morris, and M Walker Reducing social inequalities and the prevention of coronary heart disease Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 1152 - 1153. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Marmot Commentary: Risk factors or social causes? Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 33(2): 297 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|