International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:1052-1053
© International Epidemiological Association 2003
Theory and Methods |
Commentary: Estimating the causes of child deaths
School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. E-mail: a.lopez@sph.uq.edu.au
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
There is no question that preventing child mortality should be a priority for all populations. There are moral and philosophical reasons to do so (the fair innings argument). The replacement of populations depends on sufficient children surviving to reproductive age. It is also critical for indicators of overall population development: reductions in infant and child mortality exert substantially greater impact on levels of life expectancy than similar proportionate declines in death rates at older ages. The long-term decline in child mortality in the industrialized countries that has accompanied economic and social development has depended in part on the implementation of technologies and programmes that target specific diseases,
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Freemantle and A. Read Preventing child deaths BMJ, May 17, 2008; 336(7653): 1083 - 1084. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Lawn, K. Wilczynska-Ketende, and S. N Cousens Estimating the causes of 4 million neonatal deaths in the year 2000 Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 706 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Begg, C. Rao, and A. D Lopez Design options for sample-based mortality surveillance Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1080 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

