International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:314-315
© International Epidemiological Association 2003
Theory and Methods |
Commentary: Black and white or shades of grey?
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail: battag@ispm.unibe.ch
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In the quest for diagnostic certainty we should welcome anything that improves our ability to interpret diagnostic tests. In this issue of the International Journal of Epidemiology Joël Coste and Jacques Pouchot1 describe a method for constructing a three-zone division for continuously measured diagnostic test results. The concept of three-zone diagnostic decision making, coined by Feinstein in 1990,2 strengthens the explanatory power of our customary yesno reasoning by including a grey zone of intermediate values in which a disease cannot be said
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Coste, P. Jourdain, and J. Pouchot A Gray Zone Assigned to Inconclusive Results of Quantitative Diagnostic Tests: Application to the Use of Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Diagnosis of Heart Failure in Acute Dyspneic Patients Clin. Chem., December 1, 2006; 52(12): 2229 - 2235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
