International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:833-838
© International Epidemiological Association 2001
Socioeconomic differentials |
Socioeconomic differences in behavioural and biological risk factors: a comparison of a Japanese and an English cohort of employed men
a International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. E-mail: pekka{at}public-health.ucl.ac.uk
b Population Research Unit, Department of Sociology, PO Box 18, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
c Health Care Centre and
d Department of Public Health, Kanazawa Medical University, 1–1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa 920–0293, Japan.
e Department of Welfare Promotion and Epidemiology, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930–0194, Japan.
Abstract
Background To compare socioeconomic differences in behavioural and biological risk factors in Japanese and English 39–59-year-old employed men.
Methods We measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio and fibrinogen at medical screenings and smoking and alcohol consumption in health questionnaires among Japanese non-manual and manual employees of a steel products company and among English non-manual employees working in Civil Service departments.
Results In England, higher employment grades were advantaged with regard to most risk factors studied. In Japan the picture was different in that higher grades had higher BMI, waist-to-hip-ratio and lower HDL cholesterol. In Japan employment grade differences in these three risk factors are clearly larger among younger men than among older men, while in England age differentials in the grade differences are small. Similar results were obtained for education.
Conclusions Important differences in the social patterning of risk factors were observed in our cohorts of employed Japanese and English men. The contribution that these risk factors make in explaining social differences in health may vary accordingly. Studies that identify the common and unique determinants of socioeconomic health differences in different populations are needed.
Keywords Socioeconomic status, risk factors, comparative study
Accepted 4 October 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. B Dowd and N. Goldman Do biomarkers of stress mediate the relation between socioeconomic status and health? J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2006; 60(7): 633 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y.-H. Khang and H. R. Kim Explaining socioeconomic inequality in mortality among South Koreans: an examination of multiple pathways in a nationally representative longitudinal study Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E Kunst Commentary: Using geographical data to monitor socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: experiences from Japanese studies Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 110 - 112. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|