Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipworth, L.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipworth, L.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:303-308
© International Epidemiological Association 2001


Theory and Methods

Comparison of surrogate with self-respondents regarding medical history and prior medication use

Loren Lipwortha,c, Jon P Fryzeka,c, C Michael Foredb, William J Blota,c and Joseph K McLaughlina,c

a International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
b Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
c Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

Correspondence: International Epidemiology Institute, 1455 Research Blvd, Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. E-mail: loren3{at}earthlink.net

Abstract

Background The self-report of medical history and medication use is a common feature of epidemiological research.

Methods In a unique re-interview study, we evaluated the concordance of medical conditions and past medication use reported in two similar interviews 5 years apart.

Results In 196 re-interviews with the subjects themselves, and in 107 with next-of-kin of subjects who died after the first interview, agreement was good or excellent (kappa >=0.40) for 90% (9/10) of the conditions asked about in the personal medical history for both next-of-kin and self-respondents. Agreement was excellent (kappa >0.75) for two conditions, high blood pressure and hysterectomy, among self-respondents. Self- and surrogate respondents also showed similar reproducibility for prescription medications, but next-of-kin respondents tended to have poor agreement (kappa <0.40) for over-the-counter (OTC) medications such as antacids, antihistamines, and analgesics. Next-of-kin also less reliably reported a family history of cancer. When analyses were stratified by type of surrogate respondent, concordance between the two interviews was generally higher for spouses than for other surrogate respondents.

Conclusions This research demonstrates that personal medical history and prescription medication use may be as reliably reported by next-of-kin as self-respondents, but suggests that additional information may be needed to validate measures of OTC medication use and family history of cancer for next-of-kin respondents, possibly through the review of hospital records.

Keywords Self-respondents, next-of-kin, medication use, medical conditions

Accepted 10 July 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. E. Lucas, H. K. Armenian, G. M. Petersen, and P. C. Rowe
Familial aggregation of fainting in a case-control study of neurally mediated hypotension patients who present with unexplained chronic fatigue
Europace, October 1, 2006; 8(10): 846 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.