International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:240-247
© International Epidemiological Association 2001
Special Theme: Socioeconomic Differentials in Health |
Urban cause-specific socioeconomic mortality differences. Which causes of death contribute most?
Department of Epidemiology, Municipal Health Service The Hague, PO Box 12652, 2500 DP The Hague, The Netherlands.
Correspondence: Barend Jacob Cornelis Middelkoop, GGD (Municipal Health Service) The Hague, PO Box 12652, 2500 DP The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: b.j.c.middelkoop{at}ocw.denhaag.nl
Abstract
Background Cause-specific information on socioeconomic differences in health is necessary for a rational public health policy. At the local level, the Municipal Health Service studies these differences in order to support the authorities in policy making.
Methods Mortality data of the under 65 age group in The Hague were analysed (1982–1991) at residential area level.
Results Causes of death with a high socioeconomic gradient among males were: homicide, chronic liver disease, ‘other’ external causes of injury, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema and asthma, and motor vehicle accidents; and among females: diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, ‘other’ diseases of the circulatory system, signs, symptoms and ill-defined conditions, malignant neoplasm of cervix, and ‘other’ diseases. Main contributors to the mortality differences between the highest and lowest socioeconomic quartiles among males were: ischaemic heart disease (17.3%), ‘other’ diseases of the circulatory system (10.2%), signs, symptoms and ill-defined conditions (9.0%), ‘other’ external causes of injury (8.6%), and chronic liver disease (7.2%); and among females: ischaemic heart disease (25.5%), ‘other’ diseases (20.1%), signs, symptoms and ill-defined conditions (18.6%), ‘other’ diseases of the circulatory system (11.0%), and diabetes (9.1%). Among females the contributions of malignant neoplasms of breast (–16.3%) and colon (–5.5%) and suicide (–4.3%) were negative.
Conclusions The diseases that are the main contributors to urban socioeconomic mortality differences can be influenced by public health policy.
Keywords Cause of death, differential mortality, mortality, small area analysis, socioeconomic factors, urban health
Accepted 24 May 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Fukuda, K. Nakamura, and T. Takano Cause-specific mortality differences across socioeconomic position of municipalities in Japan, 1973-1977 and 1993-1998: increased importance of injury and suicide in inequality for ages under 75 Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C Borrell, M Rodriguez, J Ferrando, M T Brugal, M I Pasarin, V Martinez, and A Plasencia Role of individual and contextual effects in injury mortality: new evidence from small area analysis Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Blane Commentary: Socioeconomic health differentials Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2001; 30(2): 292 - 293. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M Najman Commentary: General or cause-specific factors in explanations of class inequalities in health Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2001; 30(2): 296 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|