Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. M
Right arrow Articles by Selvin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. M
Right arrow Articles by Selvin, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:60-65
© International Epidemiological Association 2001


Special Theme: Fetal Origins of Health and Disease

Lowered weight gain during pregnancy and risk of neural tube defects among offspring

Gary M Shawa, Karen Todoroffa, Suzan L Carmichaela, Donna M Schafferb and Steve Selvinc

a March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Emeryville, CA, USA.
b Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA, USA.
c Divisions of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Reprint requests to: Dr Shaw, California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 1900 Powell St. Suite 1050, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.

Abstract

Background Maternal nutritional factors have been implicated in the complex aetiology of neural tube defects (NTD). We investigated whether the amount of weight a woman gained during pregnancy was associated with her risk of delivering an infant with an NTD.

Methods We conducted a population-based case-control study within the cohort of 708 129 live births and fetal deaths occurring in selected California counties in 1989–1991. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with mothers of 538 (88% of eligible) NTD cases (including those electively terminated, stillborn, or liveborn) and with mothers of 539 (88%) non-malformed liveborn controls within an average of 5 months from the term delivery date. Respondent-reported weight gain during pregnancy (kg) was analysed. Risks of infants having NTD were estimated among women who gained <10kg compared to those who gained >=10kg during >=38 week gestations.

Results Compared to women who gained >=10kg, an increased risk for NTD offspring was observed among women who gained <10kg (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, 95% CI : 2.3–4.6). The OR was 5.0 (95% CI : 2.6–9.7) among those women who gained <5 kg during pregnancy. The increased risk was not attributable to maternal non-use of a multivitamin containing folic acid, diabetes, NTD-pregnancy history, age, race/ethnicity, education, gravidity, alcohol use, cigarette use, prepregnant obesity, low socioeconomic status, dieting, nausea, nor to lower dietary intakes of folate, zinc, energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, and methionine. An increased risk was observed even after simultaneous adjustment for most of these factors (OR = 2.2, 95% CI : 1.2–3.8). The risk associated with gaining <10kg was greater for anencephaly, but still elevated for spina bifida.

Conclusions We did not have information on weight gain during early pregnancy. Because weight gain during the relevant embryological period for NTD (first month post-conception) is relatively small and often variable, it seems less likely that elevated NTD risks indicate a causal association between lowered weight gain throughout pregnancy and abnormal development of the neural tube. It seems more likely that lowered weight gain is a consequence of carrying an NTD-affected fetus. However, what this consequence is and why risk was substantially larger for anencephaly is unknown.

Keywords Congenital anomalies, anencephaly, birth defects, pregnancy, teratogens, aetiology, spina bifida, body mass index

Accepted 8 February 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. Wolff, C. T. Witkop, T. Miller, and S. B. Syed
Folic Acid Supplementation for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defects: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, May 5, 2009; 150(9): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. J. Stothard, P. W. G. Tennant, R. Bell, and J. Rankin
Maternal Overweight and Obesity and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
JAMA, February 11, 2009; 301(6): 636 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Carmichael, G. M. Shaw, D. M. Schaffer, C. Laurent, and S. Selvin
Dieting Behaviors and Risk of Neural Tube Defects
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1127 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. B. Terry and E. Susser
Commentary: The impact of fetal and infant exposures along the life course
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2001; 30(1): 95 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. A Leon
Commentary: Getting to grips with fetal programming--aspects of a rapidly evolving agenda
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2001; 30(1): 96 - 98.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.