Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pesch, B.
Right arrow Articles by Schill, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pesch, B.
Right arrow Articles by Schill, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:1014-1024
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Occupational risk factors for renal cell carcinoma: agent-specific results from a case-control study in Germany

Beate Pescha, Johannes Haertingb, Ulrich Ranfta, Andreas Klimpelc, Burkhard Oelschlägelb, Walter Schilld and and the MURC Study Group,e

a Medical Institute for Environmental Hygiene at the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
b Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Medical Informatics at the Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany.
c Institute for Kidney and Hypertension Research, Berlin, Germany.
d Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Bremen, Germany.
e Collaborators of the Multicenter Urothelial and Renal Cancer Study (MURC Study Group): Wolfgang Barth, Uta Brettschneider, Elisabeth Bronder, Katrin Farker, Johannes Faßbinder, Rainer Frentzel-Beyme, Eberhard Greiser, Karin Greiser, Lothar Heinemann, Annemarie Hoffmann, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Werner Hofmann, Christine Lautenschläger, Ullrich Matz, Martin Molzahn, Wolfgang Pommer, Manfred Steinkohl.

Reprint requests: Beate Pesch, Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, Medical Institute for Environmental Hygiene, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Background This case-control study was conducted to estimate the renal cell cancer (RCC) risk for exposure to occupation-related agents, besides other suspected risk factors.

Methods In a population-based multicentre study, 935 incident RCC cases and 4298 controls matched for region, sex, and age were interviewed between 1991 and 1995 for their occupational history and lifestyle habits. Agent-specific exposure was expert-rated with two job-exposure matrices and a job task-exposure matrix. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate smoking adjusted odds ratios (OR).

Results Very long exposures in the chemical, rubber, and printing industries were associated with risk for RCC. Males considered as ‘substantially exposed to organic solvents’ showed a significant excess risk (OR = 1.6, 95% CI : 1.1–2.3). In females substantial exposure to solvents was also a significant risk factor (OR = 2.1, 95% CI : 1.0–4.4). Excess risks were shown for high exposure to cadmium (OR = 1.4, 95% CI : 1.1–1.8, in men, OR = 2.5, 95% CI : 1.2–5.3 in women), for substantial exposure to lead (OR = 1.5, 95% CI : 1.0–2.3, in men, OR = 2.6, 95% CI : 1.2–5.5, in women) and to solder fumes (OR = 1.5, 95% CI : 1.0–2.4, in men). In females, an excess risk for the task ‘soldering, welding, milling’ was found (OR = 3.0, 95% CI : 1.1–7.8). Exposure to paints, mineral oils, cutting fluids, benzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and asbestos showed an association with RCC development.

Conclusions Our results indicate that substantial exposure to metals and solvents may be nephrocarcinogenic. There is evidence for a gender-specific susceptibility of the kidneys.

Keywords Cadmium, cadmium compounds, case-control study, gender differences, job-exposure matrix, occupation, renal cell carcinoma, trichloroethylene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. J. Canchola, P. L. Horn-Ross, and D. M. Purdie
Risk of Second Primary Malignancies in Women with Papillary Thyroid Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2006; 163(6): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. C. Chao and S. M. Lipkin
Molecular models for the tissue specificity of DNA mismatch repair-deficient carcinogenesis
Nucleic Acids Res., February 6, 2006; 34(3): 840 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
M Filipic, T Fatur, and M Vudrag
Molecular mechanisms of cadmium induced mutagenicity
Human and Experimental Toxicology, February 1, 2006; 25(2): 67 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
O. Raaschou-Nielsen, J. Hansen, J. K. McLaughlin, H. Kolstad, J. M. Christensen, R. E. Tarone, and J. H. Olsen
Cancer Risk among Workers at Danish Companies using Trichloroethylene: A Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1182 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
L. Jarup
Hazards of heavy metal contamination
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2003; 68(1): 167 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Buzio, G De Palma, P Mozzoni, M Tondel, C Buzio, I Franchini, O Axelson, and A Mutti
Glutathione S-transferases M1-1 and T1-1 as risk modifiers for renal cell cancer associated with occupational exposure to chemicals
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2003; 60(10): 789 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. Pesch, U. Ranft, P. Jakubis, M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen, A. Hergemoller, K. Unfried, M. Jakubis, P. Miskovic, T. Keegan, and the EXPASCAN Study Group
Environmental Arsenic Exposure from a Coal-burning Power Plant as a Potential Risk Factor for Nonmelanoma Skin Carcinoma: Results from a Case-Control Study in the District of Prievidza, Slovakia
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2002; 155(9): 798 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.