Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, E. D
Right arrow Articles by Jelfs, P. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, E. D
Right arrow Articles by Jelfs, P. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:813-816
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Cervical cancer mortality in Australia: contrasting risk by Aboriginality, age and rurality

Edward D O'Briena, Ross S Bailieb and Paul L Jelfsc

a Australian Capital Territory Department of Health and Community Care, Locked Bag No. 5, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia.
b Menzies School of Health Research and Flinders University Northern Territory Clinical School.
c Disease Registers Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

Background The poor health status of Australia's indigenous population is reflected in relatively high mortality rates from almost all causes, including preventable causes such as cervical cancer, where the rate is six to eight times that of non-Aboriginal women. However, there is little information on the geographical distribution of risk, an important issue for service deployment. This study examined the risk of death from cervical cancer in relation to Indigenous status, age and rurality.

Methods Data from death registers from Australian states and territories who have identified Aboriginal people were examined for 1986–1997 to obtain a list of all deaths where the primary cause was cancer of the cervix. The data categorized females by 5-year age group, by metropolitan, rural or remote category and by Indigenous status. Mean age at death and standardized mortality ratios for deaths from cervical cancer were calculated for Aboriginal compared with non-Aboriginal women in metropolitan, rural and remote areas.

Results The risk of death from cervical cancer for Aboriginal women compared with non-Aboriginal women increased by 4.3-fold for metropolitan areas, 9.7-fold for rural areas and 18.3-fold for remote areas.

Conclusions Aboriginal women in rural and remote areas of Australia are at significantly higher risk of death from cancer of the cervix than either Aboriginal women in metropolitan areas or non-Aboriginal women in any area. This result raises questions about access to services for prevention and early diagnosis and other factors that might impact on the incidence and natural history of the disease.

Keywords Cervical cancer, Aboriginal, Indigenous, remote, rural, metropolitan

Accepted 1 March 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.