International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:793-798
© International Epidemiological Association 2000
Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women
a Epidemiology & Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
b Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. Formerly at Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
c Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, USA.
d Division of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Formerly at Division of Epidemiology, Columbia University School of Public Health, USA.
e Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, USA.
Reprint requests to: Patricia Madigan, US National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Environmental Epidemiology Branch, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS—MSC 7234, Bethesda, MD 20852–7234, USA.
Background This study assessed the nature of potential biases by comparing respondents with non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women.
Methods The case-control study was conducted in three regions in the US: Atlanta GA, Seattle/Puget Sound WA, and central New Jersey. An abbreviated interview or mailed questionnaire was completed by willing non-respondents, most of whom had refused participation in the main study.
Results Respondents and non-respondents appeared similar with respect to age, race, relative weight, smoking, family history of breast cancer, number of births, age at first birth, and several dietary items. Compared to non-respondents, case and control respondents were of shorter stature, and reported less frequent consumption of doughnuts/pastries. Respondent cases, compared with non-respondent cases, were more highly educated and more likely to have consumed alcohol regularly; similar but not statistically significant tendencies were observed for controls. Respondent cases experienced menarche earlier than non-respondents. Respondent controls were more likely to have used oral contraceptives than non-respondents; a similar but not statistically significant tendency was observed in cases. Comparisons of crude and simulated relative risks using available non-respondents' data generally showed a low impact of non-response on relative risks in this study.
Conclusions Our results suggest that non-response would not greatly affect relative risk estimates in this study, except possibly regarding height. However, we were limited by the numbers of informative non-respondents and the amount of data collected. Collecting similar information in future studies would be useful, especially since varying methods used to encourage participation may lead to differences in respondents' characteristics.
Keywords Breast neoplasms, epidemiologic study, selection bias, non-response, oral contraceptives, diet, reproductive history, alcohol drinking
Accepted 7 February 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. E. Cogswell, R. H. Bitsko, M. Anderka, A. R. Caton, M. L. Feldkamp, S. M. H. Sherlock, R. E. Meyer, T. Ramadhani, J. M. Robbins, G. M. Shaw, et al. Control Selection and Participation in an Ongoing, Population-based, Case-Control Study of Birth Defects: The National Birth Defects Prevention Study Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2009; 170(8): 975 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. F. Beaber, V. L. Holt, K. E. Malone, P. L. Porter, J. R. Daling, and C. I. Li Reproductive Factors, Age at Maximum Height, and Risk of Three Histologic Types of Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3427 - 3434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. J. Cleland, K. Ball, J. Salmon, A. F. Timperio, and D. A. Crawford Personal, social and environmental correlates of resilience to physical inactivity among women from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds Health Educ. Res., October 29, 2008; (2008) cyn054v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V Inglis, K Ball, and D Crawford Socioeconomic variations in women's diets: what is the role of perceptions of the local food environment? J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2008; 62(3): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Mensah, E. Willett, J Simpson, A. Smith, and E Roman Birth Order and Sibship Size: Evaluation of the Role of Selection Bias in a Case-Control Study of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 717 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. F. Trivers, M. D. Gammon, P. E. Abrahamson, M. J. Lund, E. W. Flagg, P. G. Moorman, J. S. Kaufman, J. Cai, P. L. Porter, L. A. Brinton, et al. Oral Contraceptives and Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Aged 20 to 54 Years Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1822 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Li, R. S. Day, M. L. Bondy, R. Sinha, N. T. Nguyen, D. B. Evans, J. L. Abbruzzese, and M. M. Hassan Dietary Mutagen Exposure and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 655 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Ball, A. Timperio, J. Salmon, B. Giles-Corti, R. Roberts, and D. Crawford Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2007; 61(2): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. G. Spector, S. M. Davies, L. L. Robison, J. M. Hilden, M. Roesler, and J. A. Ross Birth Characteristics, Maternal Reproductive History, and the Risk of Infant Leukemia: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 128 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Lewis, R. M. Harbord, R. Harris, and G. D. Smith Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk. J Natl Cancer Inst, November 15, 2006; 98(22): 1607 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-H. Tung, L. R. Wilkens, A. H. Wu, K. McDuffie, A. M. Y. Nomura, L. N. Kolonel, K. Y. Terada, and M. T. Goodman Effect of Anovulation Factors on Pre- and Postmenopausal Ovarian Cancer Risk: Revisiting the Incessant Ovulation Hypothesis Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2005; 161(4): 321 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-H. Tung, M. T. Goodman, A. H. Wu, K. McDuffie, L. R. Wilkens, A. M. Y. Nomura, and L. N. Kolonel Aggregation of Ovarian Cancer with Breast, Ovarian, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer in First-degree Relatives Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2004; 159(8): 750 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Niell, G. Rennert, J. D. Bonner, R. Almog, L. P. Tomsho, and S. B. Gruber BRCA1 and BRCA2 Founder Mutations and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, January 7, 2004; 96(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-H. Tung, M. T. Goodman, A. H. Wu, K. McDuffie, L. R. Wilkens, L. N. Kolonel, A. M. Y. Nomura, K. Y. Terada, M. E. Carney, and L. H. Sobin Reproductive Factors and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk by Histologic Type:A Multiethnic Case-Control Study Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 158(7): 629 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Butler, R. Sinha, R. C. Millikan, C. F. Martin, B. Newman, M. D. Gammon, A. S. Ammerman, and R. S. Sandler Heterocyclic Amines, Meat Intake, and Association with Colon Cancer in a Population-based Study Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2003; 157(5): 434 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Britton, M. D. Gammon, J. B. Schoenberg, J. L. Stanford, R. J. Coates, C. A. Swanson, N. Potischman, K. E. Malone, D. J. Brogan, J. R. Daling, et al. Risk of Breast Cancer Classified by Joint Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Status among Women 20-44 Years of Age Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2002; 156(6): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Brogan, M. M. Denniston, J. M. Liff, E. W. Flagg, R. J. Coates, and L. A. Brinton Comparison of Telephone Sampling and Area Sampling: Response Rates and Within-Household Coverage Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 153(11): 1119 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|