Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 701-710, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association

ARTICLES

A modified method for the epidemiological analysis of registry data on infants with multiple malformations

KB Kallen, EE Castilla, M da Graca Dutra, P Mastroiacovo, E Robert and BA Kallen
Tornblad Institute, University of Lund, Sweden. Karin.Kallen@anatom.lu.se

BACKGROUND: Infants with multiple malformations are important in birth defect epidemiology and malformation monitoring because human teratogens have often caused complex malformations. Various methods for the analysis of multimalformed infants have been tried. METHOD: By using data from four large registries of congenital malformations, 5256 infants were identified with two or more among 73 selected malformations. Pairwise associations between malformations were detected by multiple logistic regression analyses, and putative confounders (programme, maternal age, autopsy, etc.) were controlled for. For each significant pairwise association, further analyses were performed in order to find associations with a possible third malformation. RESULTS: The importance of controlling for several confounders was demonstrated. Several well-known associations were found, which supports the technique used. The interpretation of three- way associations was discussed. Results from the present study were compared with those obtained using some other methods. CONCLUSIONS: Different confounders can cause biased associations. The method presented in the paper takes this into consideration and is therefore more likely than previously used techniques to give unbiased information on the clustering of different malformations among multimalformed infants.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.